| Semester | Instructor | Course | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Q5 | Q6 | Q7 | Q8 |
|---|
| Spring 2007 | Sankaralingam | CS752 | 4.47 (15) | 4.87 (15) | 4.67 (15) | 4.87 (15) | 4.57 (14) | 3.92 (13) | 4.47 (15) | 4.67 (15) |
| Fall 2007 | Sankaralingam | CS752 | 4.00 (8) | 4.25 (8) | 4.62 (8) | 4.62 (8) | 3.88 (8) | 3.38 (8) | 4.12 (8) | 4.12 (8) |
| Spring 2008 | Sankaralingam | CS552 | 4.35 (23) | 4.70 (23) | 4.70 (23) | 4.91 (23) | 4.64 (22) | 3.79 (19) | 4.22 (23) | 4.74 (23) |
| Fall 2008 | SANKARALINGAM | CS755 | 3.80 (15) | 4.13 (15) | 4.60 (15) | 4.20 (15) | 4.75 (12) | 3.53 (15) | 3.73 (15) | 3.93 (15) |
| Spring 2009 | SANKARALINGAM | CS552 | 4.49 (39) | 4.87 (39) | 4.74 (39) | 4.82 (39) | 4.58 (38) | 3.65 (37) | 4.05 (39) | 4.46 (39) |
| Fall 2009 | SANKARALINGAM | CS755 | 4.86 (7) | 4.71 (7) | 4.57 (7) | 4.86 (7) | 4.14 (7) | 4.25 (7) | 4.43 (7) | 4.71 (7) |
Teaching assistants are assigned to different sections of this course eachsemester just before the start of classes.
Key:
| 3.45 (17) | 17 students responded to the question and the average rating was 3.45. |
- Q1
- The usefulness of the instructor's presentations in learning thecourse matter:
1 = USELESS ... 5 = ESSENTIAL
- Q2
- The instructor's command of the course material:
1 = USELESS ... 5 = EXTREMELY STRONG
- Q3
- The instructor's responsiveness to student questions:
1 = TOTALLY UNRESPONSIVE ... 5 = EXTREMELY RESPONSIVE
- Q4
- The enthusiasm shown by the instructor in teaching:
1 = APATHETIC ... 5 = VERY ENTHUSIASTIC
- Q5
- The availability of the instructor for out-of-classcontact:
1 = NEVER AVAILABLE ... 5 = REMARKABLE
- Q6
- Value of handouts prepared by instructor:
1 = USELESS ... 5 = VERY USEFUL
- Q7
- Would you recommend the course?
1 = DEFINITELY NOT ... 5 = YES, DEFINITELY
- Q8
- Would you recommend the instructor?
1 = DEFINITELY NOT ... 5 = YES, DEFINITELY